When you’re building a tech startup, strong media coverage can accelerate growth. A well-placed quote, a thoughtful industry perspective, or a strategic product announcement can drive brand awareness, attract investors, and position your leadership team as thought leaders in their space.
For most early-stage startups, the answer to "Should we take this media opportunity?" should be an enthusiastic yes. Media requests represent valuable chances to build relationships with journalists, expand your thought leadership footprint, and gain credibility in adjacent areas of expertise. Even topics slightly outside your wheelhouse can offer opportunities to demonstrate your broader industry knowledge and establish your founders or subject matter experts as versatile, insightful voices in the tech ecosystem.
But (and this is crucial) there are specific scenarios where even the most media-hungry startups should pause and evaluate carefully. Knowing when to say "no" to journalists can be just as important as knowing when to say "yes." For tech startups navigating an increasingly complex media landscape, strategic restraint in select situations is essential.
The Default Should Be "Yes" With Exceptions
Before diving into the scenarios where caution is warranted, let's be clear: most media requests deserve serious consideration. Building relationships with journalists is one of the most valuable long-term investments a startup can make. Every interaction is an opportunity to demonstrate your expertise, expand your network, and position your company within broader industry conversations.
Smart reporters often reach out to startups not just for their core expertise, but because they recognize that innovative companies bring fresh perspectives to adjacent topics. A fintech startup might offer valuable insights on the future of work, or a B2B SaaS company might have compelling thoughts on consumer behavior trends. These "stretch" opportunities can be goldmines for establishing broader thought leadership and showcasing the well-rounded thinking that investors and customers value.
However, there are specific red-flag scenarios where even the most publicity-hungry startups should pause and consider whether engagement serves their long-term interests. Here are the situations that warrant careful evaluation.
Competitor Failures or Missteps
Why: Risk of appearing opportunistic, unprofessional, or drawing retaliation.
Example: Not commenting on a rival startup's data breach, layoffs, or product recall.
When a competitor stumbles, journalists may reach out for industry commentary. While it might be tempting to position your company as the stable alternative, commenting on competitor failures rarely pays off. You risk appearing opportunistic, unprofessional, or petty — none of which are good looks for a growing startup.
Additionally, the startup ecosystem is smaller than you think. Today's competitor could be tomorrow's acquisition target, strategic partner, or even source of key talent. Maintaining professional relationships across your industry is far more valuable than scoring short-term PR points.
Unlaunched or Pivoted Products
Why: Talking prematurely can set false expectations and create press that ages poorly.
Example: Not commenting on AI product features that are in private beta, or that were quietly killed.
Startup timelines are notoriously fluid. That AI feature you're excited about might get deprioritized next quarter. That product pivot you're exploring might not pan out. Speaking publicly about unreleased products or strategic directions can lock you into commitments you're not ready to make.
Premature announcements can also create unrealistic expectations among customers, investors, and talent. When timelines shift or priorities change, as they inevitably do in startup life, you'll find yourself either disappointing stakeholders or scrambling to deliver on promises that no longer align with your business reality.
Sensitive Industry Timing
Why: Your message might get lost in larger industry narratives or seem tone-deaf.
Example: A meal delivery startup announcing "lightning-fast delivery" during a major city-wide power outage.
Context matters enormously in media coverage. A product announcement that would normally generate positive coverage might fall flat or even backfire if it coincides with negative industry news. Similarly, promoting news during moments like this can come off as tone-deaf.
Monitoring industry sentiment and timing your communications accordingly shows media savvy and cultural awareness, qualities that serve startups well in both good times and bad.
Topics Outside Your Expertise? Usually Worth Exploring
Why to generally say yes: Expanding your thought leadership footprint and demonstrating broader industry knowledge.
When to pause: If you truly have no relevant perspective or the topic could damage your credibility.
Example: A fintech startup commenting on healthcare regulations might work if you're building financial tools for healthcare providers, but probably not if you're focused purely on consumer banking.
Doing this right could be a cybersecurity startup providing valuable insights on remote work policies, or an AI company might offer compelling thoughts on education technology trends.
The key is honest self-assessment: Do you have a genuine, informed perspective to offer? Can you connect this topic to your company's mission or expertise in a meaningful way? If yes, these "adjacent expertise" opportunities often yield the highest return on investment, positioning your leadership team as broad thinkers rather than narrow specialists.
However, if you're truly speaking outside your wheelhouse with no relevant connection to your business, the risk of appearing uninformed or opportunistic outweighs the potential benefits.
During Internal Turmoil
Why: Mixed messages or distractions can amplify internal challenges.
Example: Avoiding growth strategy interviews during a co-founder departure, or declining culture pieces during internal restructuring.
Startups face constant internal challenges, from fundraising stress to team changes to strategic pivots. While these challenges are normal, they can affect your team's ability to deliver consistent, confident messaging during media interactions.
If your company is navigating significant internal changes, consider limiting media engagement on sensitive topics until you've stabilized internally. This prevents mixed messages, protects your team's focus, and ensures that when you do engage with media, you're putting your best foot forward.
The Power of Strategic "Yes" With Occasional Strategic "No"
The reality is that most media requests represent valuable opportunities to build relationships, expand your thought leadership, and demonstrate your company's expertise to new audiences. The default mindset should be finding ways to engage meaningfully with journalists, even when the topic isn't perfectly aligned with your core business.
However, saying no to specific media requests isn't about being difficult or missing opportunities — it's about being strategic in selecting high-risk situations. Every declined request should create space for more meaningful engagement, every passed opportunity should allow you to focus on higher-impact activities, and every strategic "no" should reinforce your company's discipline and focus.
Remember: journalists respect companies that are thoughtful about their media engagement. A politely declined request today, when accompanied by a suggestion for better timing or a more relevant spokesperson, can actually strengthen relationships and lead to more strategic opportunities tomorrow.
In the attention economy, knowing when to engage strategically is your startup's most valuable communications skill. The goal isn't to minimize media engagement, but to maximize the impact of every interaction you choose to pursue.
LEAVE A COMMENT